RCBOs - are they legally required in a new Consumer Unit?
Ask questions and find answers to many subjects relating to electrics and electrical work

4 posts   •   Page 1 of 1
crontab
Labourer
Labourer
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010 2:16 pm

RCBOs - are they legally required in a new Consumer Unit?

by crontab » Tue Sep 28, 2010 2:19 pm

Hi
I am renovating a house and it needs a complete rewire.
I spoke to an electrician about replacing the consumer unit, and mentioned that you can get them in Screwfix for 80 quid, and he told me that they don't meet regulations. Specifically, you need RCBOs on all circuits.
These RCBOs are of course pretty expensive at more than 30 quid each, which would make the consumer unit more like 300+ quid than 80 quid.
Is he correct?

Thanks
J

sparx
Project Manager
Project Manager
Posts: 2166
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 8:33 pm
Location: The fifth continent.

by sparx » Tue Sep 28, 2010 6:54 pm

No,
as long as the circuits are spread over more than one RCD.
RCBO's are much the prefered option since an earth fault on one circuit only affects that circuit.
The IEE regs. say that for safety reasons circuits must 'Be so arranged that a failure should not give rise to a dangerous situation'.
It has been said that putting say upstairs power & downstairs lights on one RCD and upstairs lights & downstairs power on the other means if an RCD trips causing loss of lights property can easily be made safe by use of plugged in lights on the power circuit.
I believe that the extra cost when doing a consumer unit change is well worth it in convenience terms.
regards

ericmark
Project Manager
Project Manager
Posts: 2853
Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2009 9:49 pm
Location: Llanfair Caereinion, Mid Wales.

by ericmark » Thu Sep 30, 2010 8:47 am

The only legal requirement is Part P with domestic and with electricity at work act commercial and although these can be satisfied by following the regulations and the regulations can be quoted in a court of law the regulations are not law.

It is a good job they are not law as there are a few mistakes. As written if you run a separated extra low voltage cable buried in the wall at less than 50mm it needs protecting with either a RCD or special earth encapsulated cable. This is impossible as it is a "separated" supply and so no earth protection system will work. Hence it requires the reader to use some common sense when reading the regulations.

For low voltage (House 230v is low voltage) then sockets less than 20A need RCD protection, (unless marked for something special like fridge) all items in a bathroom including lights, and cables buried less than 50mm deep unless one of the special cables are used. In the main that means everything.

It also says that the electric should be split into circuits.
(i) avoid hazards and minimize inconvenience in the event of a fault
(ii) facilitate safe inspection, testing and maintenance (see also Section 537)
(iii) take account of danger that may arise from the failure of a single circuit such as a lighting circuit
(iv) reduce the possibility of unwanted tripping of RCDs due to excessive protective conductor currents produced
by equipment in normal operation
(v) mitigate the effects of electromagnetic interferences (EMI)
(vi) prevent the indirect energizing of a circuit intended to be isolated.

Now if one can be 100% sure nothing is likely to cause the RCD to trip without there being a fault and if it does trip there will be not danger then one could use a single RCD as is done with the supply to a caravan. However in anything but smallest flat this is unlikely to be the case and one has to make a risk assessment. In my case I decided to lose lights on the central stairs would be a problem and to lose light in the garage where the consumer unit is housed is also a problem so two emergency lights are fitted to remove the danger.

I use two RCD's and plug in MCB's which can be removed to ensure isolation when required. The house has a TN-C-S supply. Had my house had a TT supply it may have been deemed to need another form of isolation.

It is up to the designer to make this risk assessment and decide how best to comply with regulations. He must of course consider cost and I would consider items like lights which are fixed and not changed by the user are less of a problem than the sockets which the used could plug anything into.

So to protect sockets with RCBO's so they do not effect the rest of the house if it should trip makes some sense but I would consider one or two emergency lights would be far better than using loads of RBCO's. After all one can still get power cuts with main supply and no amount of RCBO's will stop that for happening.

As you can see no hard and fast rules. And without looking at your house and doing a risk assessment it would be wrong to say how many circuits the RCD protection needs to be split into. However in most houses it is considered two is enough.

crontab
Labourer
Labourer
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010 2:16 pm

by crontab » Fri Oct 01, 2010 12:45 am

Thank you sparx and eric for your replies.
I do remember now he said something about cables supposed to be buried 50mm deep and since that's impossible you therefore have to have RCBOs.
Sounds though like it is certainly not cast in stone.

Anyway he's not doing the job now, since he obviously has too many jobs to be able to find the time to return my calls :roll:

4 posts   •   Page 1 of 1
It is currently Thu Apr 25, 2024 11:23 am